Supernannies

by doodaddy on March 26, 2007

We don’t have a nanny, or a babysitter even. Nonetheless, I’ve noticed that when parents who do have help get together, the topic is one of major strife.

  • Is it OK to have two working parents and a nanny?
  • Is day care better?
  • Is a foreign-born nanny better than a U.S.-born one, because of the linguistic advantage?
  • What’s better: a 19-year old childless au pair from Norway who speaks perfect English or a 40-year old nanny (and four-time mother) from El Salvador who speaks almost no English?
  • Are nannies going to take good enough care of your kids?

Obviously, I can’t answer any of these questions. Perhaps, though, I can expose some tidbits about nannies that you who don’t use them might not know. I see them pretty much every day at the playground or our other baby activities, and here’s what I’ve noticed:

  1. Most nannies are just OK. They watch the kids well, but they are cautious (and who can blame them, really!), and if they can, they’ll let the kids play by themselves or with other kids. These nannies like to socialize with the other nannies of their linguistic group.
  2. Some nannies are un-freaking-believably good with the kids. We’ve got one of these supernannies in music class — she’s got her own charge and another 11-month old (a tag-along) and she can keep them both interested, keep an eye on them both, and teach them both something. I’ve learned tons about parenting infants from this woman. She sees her job as a profession and seems to be treated accordingly.
  3. A very slim minority (only one I’ve met regularly) are just horrible; either disengaged and neglectful or actively mean. I keep a close eye for abuse (I’m a mandatory reporter), but these are just short of it.

Unfortunately, I’ve also realized that:

  • If I were interviewing nannies, I don’t think I’d be able to tell the difference between Types 1 and 2. Type 3 might even be able to hide her proclivities in an interview.
  • There’s no particular sign — age, national origin, hair color — that differentiates them, either. Some of the best nannies are young, some are older; some are native-born, some are from other parts of the world. For that matter, one of the supernannies I’ve met was a man.
  • The Type 2 nannies seem to always work for the really rich families. I presume they make a little more than the others, and I also expect that rich folks poach the good nannies from people.
  • Even Type 2 nannies can have a Type 1 day every once in a while. (So can I, for that matter!)

More questions than answers, I know. Can I just suggest, then, this bit of advice for parents with nannies:

Once every couple of months, accompany your nannies to their usual haunts — the playground, swim class, or wherever — and get to know some of us stay-at-home parents. I’d love to be able to know you and fill you in about the good and the bad!

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Bloglines

tagged as in parentolitics ·

{ 2 comments… read them below or add one }

Blog Antagonist March 27, 2007 at 2:51 am

Nannies are not very common around here, most folks opt for Daycare instead. I don’t know why, it’s just not “the thing”. I suppose if I lived in the really wealthy areas I might see more of it, but in general, it’s not very common here.

Mandatory reporter? That’s very cool.

Reply

doodaddy March 27, 2007 at 2:08 pm

Yeah, San Francisco’s weird that way. You get an interesting mix — there’s no way we could ever afford a nanny or even daycare on what I would be making, but then we live around fairly affluent dot-com types as well as a few working-class folks who are still fighting off the gentrification.

Mandatory reporter is ’cause I still officially volunteer for a court program for foster kids, I’m a guardian ad litem. My kid aged out, but I’m still on the books as an “officer of the court.” 🙂

Dd.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: